Brent Williams

First of all, I want to say that the course is not bad, but certainly not for people who are not familiar with code. The instructor creates the code very quickly. In my perception, there was a lack of patience to explain what was being done. Another thing that really displeased me was the insertion of text in the video to correct or to make you notice something. If you want to follow the video programming along, you can't always look at the screen and with this format you might end up missing something. Another thing that displeased me and that I recently saw in the video, was in the middle of the video the instructor undoes several things he had done in the walljump to put another better solution, he asks me to correct it with him and ignore the parts of the code that he will show that have not yet been explained. However, there is a function that he even changed the name and is not explained. I stayed a while until I figured out which function he was talking about. For me, this could be avoided if the instructor re-recorded this part with the best solution, I felt laziness on his part. And finally, this thing about refactoring code after you've written a ton of code can even happen in real life, but in a course I think it's really bad. It feels like wasted work. Why not do it the way you already knew to be the best the first time? Why did you make me do it the worst way and then give me the best way? In a course I want to learn the best form the first time, if I wanted to know the worst form I wouldn't have bought a course.
- Review by Ricardo Costardi on Metroidvania Toolkit: Make a 2D Action Platformer in Unity