Certified WhiteHat Hacker Level 1 ( CWHH Level 1) (Udemy.com)

The course was hard but worth it. Loved every minute. I now know more than out ISO.

So far, so good. Interesting stuff.

So far, so good!

it's great and wow

Content is 5 years old. Using WinXP in examples etc.

It was a good match. But since I am a beginner to this field, i require more explanation

very nice

His information that he give in this course it's absolutely good and you can use in a real case of Cyber security.

Its really eye opening and has further raised my inquisitiveness on IT security .

I learned a lot and reinforced things I already knew.
Its a good course.

Very informative

All in all, this is the worst Udemy course I've seen.
The speaker doesn't seem to understand the difference between "showing he knows something" and "explaining something". I've lost count of how many times he's finished a lecture and I've had to re-watch it multiple times just to figure out what he was doing and why.
This course seems like someone's CS course project or something. There's no instructor, just what sounds like some student reading his slides (with horrible audio) and talking about them.
* A number of the lectures sound like they were recorded over a slow VoIP connection while wearing a metal bucket over the speaker's head.
* There have already been references to lectures or sections that are not in the course.
* Lecture six seems to be a repeat of lecture five.
* There's a typo in the title of a top level section (Section: 10 Social Enginnering), for bob's sake.
* Section 5, Lecture 10 is 7:06 in duration but at about 3:46 it seems the content starts over at the beginning.
* Section 7, Lecture 22 ends suddenly in the middle of a sentence.
* When the reader says in Lecture 37 that "We'll see all the sections of the Kali Linux applications in the next lecture", I knew it was a joke, as Lecture 38 is only 5:09. The joke got even better when the first three minutes of Lecture 38 were spent installing Kali. Pro tip guys: Walking a hierarchical menu structure with the mouse and reading some of the entries isn't really "showing" anything of value. "Here you have the forensics tools, which are very useful when you're doing forensics." Thank goodness I found this course or I would never have figured that out!
* And, perfect - the quiz at the end includes topics that weren't covered in the course, and asks some questions more than once.
If you don't care enough about your course to catch and fix things like this, you just don't care.
The guy reading the slides needs to SLOW DOWN. There are far too many two and three minute lectures where the course just blasts out a few bits about a concept that are less enlightening than just reading Wikipedia. Also, please learn a few new transitions other than "So, ...".
I firmly believe lecture 8, "session hijacking using XSS", would be useless or worse misleading to anyone who doesn't already have a pretty good understanding of XSS.
Most of what I've seen so far suffers from fundamental confusion about what it means to teach something. You can't just rush through a bunch of statements that while technically correct will only make sense to someone who already understands the material. You have to take the time to explain what the questions are, how the content you're presenting addresses them, why that's important or useful, and how it all fits together. This course has none of that.
The course "authors" are some "CYBER SECURITY & PRIVACY FOUNDATION", the website for which also looks like a poorly executed class project. Bad sign.