Microsoft Power Platform Functional Consultant (PL-200) (Udemy.com)

Great PL-200 course! It provides a solid understanding of the Power Platform with clear explanations of Power Apps, Power Automate, and Dataverse. The hands-on approach and practical use cases make it easy to apply concepts in real scenarios. A perfect resource for anyone preparing for the PL-200 exam or aiming to build functional business solutions.

I’m loving this course. Having worked with Dynamics 365 for many years, it’s been great to explore a different side of forms and views. Even though my screens don’t always look the same as in the course, I’ve been researching along the way to locate the controls which has helped deepen my understanding.

The full course covered everything that is included in the PL200 exam, it helped me pass the exam with high score, definitely would recommended for anyone starting with Power Platform and is also trying to get his PL200 certificate

Informative course with great examples/practice activities. Was able to pass the PL-200 exam with Parts 1 + 2 of this course and some additional deep dives in Microsoft's Learning Platform. I found that some of the topics in the 'bonus' sections were addressed in the version of the PL-200 exam I took in February of 2025, so be sure to watch all videos before your exam.

UPDATE: I got the PL-200 certification, so I am probably in a good position to speak about the quality of this course (and its twin Part 1, which I also purchased). TLDR: Simply put, this course - and Part 1 - are NOT enough to pass the exam. It might be taken as an (incomplete) reference manual and it's good to familiarise, but additional resources are absolutely necessary. 1) The course DOES NOT cover all the topics of the exam, there are many other extremely important topics that Phillip doesn't even mention. 2) Examples and exercises don't even get closer to the complexity of the questions in the exam. 3) Some of the explanations are incorrect or vague. 4) It gives you a smattering of the (ever-changing and convoluted) Power Platform UI and concepts, but it doesn't provide a solid knowledge framework. It's lacking in depth. The format is too basic: no slides, diagrams or any graphics that could really help to visualise the Power Platform architecture and how the elements are connected to each other (e.g.: security and web security). 5) To prepare for the exam, this has been my weighting: 40% this course. 10% Microsoft learning path, 30% MeasureUp, 20% Microsoft free assessment on the exam page. 2 months (I work full-time). In hindsight, I would avoid purchasing the course in favour of the free Microsoft resources, which really improved in the last few years. ----- It's a little too easy to just read what is on screen without making any effort to try to explain what it means! What's the point of a course then? Also, Microsoft cloud is chaos and confusion, which makes the task of explaining it pretty hard, but for sure this guy is confused too, a few explanations are mixed up or downright wrong

Good preparation course but sometimes the videos are abruptly stopped and it seems as if some are not necessary anymore (Power Virtual Agents --> MS Copilot) but other than that very concise explanation and very good preparation.

If you are thinking of taking the course, you will not be able to understand the content unless you take the PL100 course first. I am also taking classes in English to study English. However, in this course, we will also explain the automatic translation function in detail.

Great course, up to date. If you've already done the Pl-100 course I'd recommend doing this as well. I'm moving onto the Pl-400 after. Do you have plans to create a course for the PL-600? Can't find anything on udemy.

Thanks Phillip, I have cleared PL 100 exam just because of you. And now I have completed the course of PL 200 very soon I am going to certification exam for PL 200 also. Your lecture genuinely help me to understand all the concepts in-depth. Thanks once again!

Similar to your PL-100 course, I think it would have been better if you carried out an activity and then set the course taker a task to do something similar. In addition rather than referring to the PL-100 course, maybe a quick summary of what you are referring to would be a good addition. But overall not bad for learning. Thanks