Introduction to UX Design for Accessibility and WCAG 2.0 (Udemy.com)

Uses the term ‘handicap’. Talks and quizzes about “the four main disabilities” – who came up with these 4? They are not regulatory and not used by WCAG – he speaks as if these are universal principles, they are not. He badly and inaccurately explains colour contrast – firstly, he can’t explain that 5:1 means five times brighter, secondly, he inaccurately says that contrast has to be 5:1, in fact it is 4.5:1.

Links to research and references might be helpful as well as details on examples/opinions given. For example it is stated that flashing or blinking UX/UI is bad design but I would have enjoyed a deeper reasoning and potential positive uses for a flash or blink of the UI as it can be helpful (Figma preview flashes clickable areas when trying to move through prototypes)

Content so far is engaging, but it would improve if the creator would imagine talking to a crowd of people. A bit more 'exciting', as it the subject is... The possibility to review the course was given to me just after about 15 minutes into the course. I edited the rating to more positive, since it gets better near the end. Just a little improvement point: shorten the duration of the music/title screens a bit.

What an inspiring section! Really inspired by this. I am a web developer who have always seen accessibility more like a burden than anything else. After those 10 mins from this section I totally changed my way of viewing it. Thank you very much. I will totally share this with my co-workers

Although this is an introduction to what disabilities are and how to try to making impaired people' life better at least using web and apps, it really makes you understand the importance of following these guidelines. So it's more about "why" we should do it more then "how"... and Matt is really great in doing that. Calm tone of voice, right speed to make understand everyone what's he talking about (even for non-native English speaker). Thank you!

1.Nice concise introduction 2. I suggest the tutor adds more pictures to illustrate some of the concepts and content. e.g. when describing the type of visual impairment add some photos mimicking what such a person will see. 3. On some sections he disputes the logic of WCAG which loses him credibility on such a short course. For a longer duration course this might be acceptable to point out any potential problems.

I was very pleased with this course. I needed an introduction to the principles of WCAG for my job as UX writer and the course 100% delivered on my expectations. Content is presented concisely and clearly, with examples used effectively. I feel well-equipped to use these principles in my work going forward.

Interesting theory being brought in, rather than just "how to tick the boxes of accessibility". Very good course. Particularly enjoyed the problem solving that the lecturer used. Would have been good to expand on that into an exercise I could do rather than just a few short quizes - I think that would engage users more. Other than that, a great course :)

This course is amazing, because it really made learning about accessibility easy. It drives home why designing for everyone is important, because we as humans are all equally important, and deserve great user experiences- regardless of our level of physical ability compared to others.

Over all, it was a great lecture and learn about Accessibility. And the checklist and cheat sheet are very helpful for the future project so then I can always use them and go back when I need them. The only part I wish I had more is UX examples that the instructor has been facing in the past. The challenges and the solutions. I've been dealing with Accessibility issues as a Front End for a while but I wanted to see various solution examples from UX side. I saw some, and I get the idea however I felt not enough. Hopefully, I will see more in the future. Thanks for the great lecture though!

Quite good, straight to the point.

I was expecting to see more of UX Design